Background The COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted maternity services worldwide and imposed restrictions on societal behaviours. This national study aimed to compare obstetric intervention and pregnancy outcome rates in England during the pandemic and corresponding pre-pandemic calendar periods, and to assess whether differences in these rates varied according to ethnic and socioeconomic background. Methods and findings We conducted a national study of singleton births in English National Health Service hospitals. We compared births during the COVID-19 pandemic period (23 March 2020 to 22 February 2021) with births during the corresponding calendar period 1 year earlier. The Hospital Episode Statistics database provided administrative hospital data about maternal characteristics, obstetric inventions (induction of labour, elective or emergency cesarean section, and instrumental birth), and outcomes (stillbirth, preterm birth, small for gestational age [SGA; birthweight < 10th centile], prolonged maternal length of stay (≥3 days), and maternal 42-day readmission). Multi-level logistic regression models were used to compare intervention and outcome rates between the corresponding pre-pandemic and pandemic calendar periods and to test for interactions between pandemic period and ethnic and socioeconomic background. All models were adjusted for maternal characteristics including age, obstetric history, comorbidities, and COVID-19 status at birth. The study included 948,020 singleton births (maternal characteristics: median age 30 years, 41.6% primiparous, 8.3% with gestational diabetes, 2.4% with preeclampsia, and 1.6% with pre-existing diabetes or hypertension); 451,727 births occurred during the defined pandemic period. Maternal characteristics were similar in the pre-pandemic and pandemic periods. Compared to the pre-pandemic period, stillbirth rates remained similar (0.36% pandemic versus 0.37% pre-pandemic, p = 0.16). Preterm birth and SGA birth rates were slightly lower during the pandemic (6.0% versus 6.1% for preterm births, adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.96, 95% CI 0.94–0.97; 5.6% versus 5.8% for SGA births, aOR 0.95, 95% CI 0.93–0.96; both p < 0.001). Slightly higher rates of obstetric intervention were observed during the pandemic (40.4% versus 39.1% for induction of labour, aOR 1.04, 95% CI 1.03–1.05; 13.9% versus 12.9% for elective cesarean section, aOR 1.13, 95% CI 1.11–1.14; 18.4% versus 17.0% for emergency cesarean section, aOR 1.07, 95% CI 1.06–1.08; all p < 0.001). Lower rates of prolonged maternal length of stay (16.7% versus 20.2%, aOR 0.77, 95% CI 0.76–0.78, p < 0.001) and maternal readmission (3.0% versus 3.3%, aOR 0.88, 95% CI 0.86–0.90, p < 0.001) were observed during the pandemic period. There was some evidence that differences in the rates of preterm birth, emergency cesarean section, and unassisted vaginal birth varied according to the mother’s ethnic background but not according to her socioeconomic background. A key limitation is that multiple comparisons were made, increasing the chance of false-positive results. Conclusions In this study, we found very small decreases in preterm birth and SGA birth rates and very small increases in induction of labour and elective and emergency cesarean section during the COVID-19 pandemic, with some evidence of a slightly different pattern of results in women from ethnic minority backgrounds. These changes in obstetric intervention rates and pregnancy outcomes may be linked to women’s behaviour, environmental exposure, changes in maternity practice, or reduced staffing levels. In a nationwide cohort study, Ipek Gurol-Urganci and colleagues study obstetric intervention rates and pregnancy outcomes in England during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic. Author summary Why was this study done? The COVID-19 pandemic has been associated with a reduction in the rates of preterm births and small-for-gestational-age births in some high-income settings. It is unknown how changes in high-income settings have influenced rates of obstetric interventions, and whether the pandemic has exacerbated existing inequalities in maternity care and outcomes. What did the researchers do and find? We conducted a national population-based study, using administrative hospital records from England to compare obstetric intervention rates and maternal outcomes during the pandemic period and the corresponding calendar period 1 year earlier. Rates of obstetric interventions were slightly higher in England during the pandemic than in the pre-pandemic period. There was some evidence of slightly lower rates of preterm birth and small-for-gestational-age birth. There were very small variations in the pattern of results according to women’s ethnic background. What do these findings mean? The COVID-19 pandemic was not associated with overall worse pregnancy outcomes in England. However, there was a higher rate of obstetric interventions, which may have been the consequence of lockdown restrictions and service interruptions. The results should be interpreted with caution. All differences were small, and many comparisons were made.
【초록키워드】 COVID-19, pandemic, COVID-19 pandemic, hospital, Variation, Comorbidities, Intervention, diabetes, outcome, hypertension, database, cohort study, hospitals, preeclampsia, outcomes, Maternal, Pregnancy, Preterm birth, Stillbirth, Characteristics, comparison, environmental exposure, Cesarean section, Birth, age, women, preterm births, pattern, England, Care, Gestational diabetes, readmission, Evidence, Interaction, Obstetric, lockdown restrictions, False-positive results, evidence of, National Health Service, in some, gestational age, adjusted odds ratio, emergency cesarean section, 95% CI, chance, caution, median age, logistic regression model, multiple comparisons, National, Lower, researcher, decrease, English, elective cesarean section, primiparous, defined, occurred, Rate, remained, exacerbated, conducted, provided, reduced, adjusted, were used, changes in, reduction in, diabete, increases in, Hospital Episode Statistics, lockdown restriction, multiple comparison, 【제목키워드】 Intervention, outcome, cohort study, Pregnancy,