Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic has required clinicians to urgently identify new treatment options or the re-purposing of existing drugs. Of particular interest are chloroquine (CQ) and hydroxychloroquine (HCQ). The aims of this systematic review are to systematically identify and collate 24 studies describing the use of CQ and HCQ in human clinical trials and to provide a detailed synthesis of evidence of its efficacy and safety. Of clinical trials, 100% showed no significant difference in the probability of viral transmission or clearance in prophylaxis or therapy, respectively, compared to the control group. Among observational studies employing an endpoint specific to efficacy, 58% concurred with the finding of no significant difference in the attainment of outcomes. Three-fifths of clinical trials and half of observational studies examining an indicator unique to drug safety discovered a higher probability of adverse events in those treated patients suspected of, and diagnosed with, COVID-19. Of the total papers focusing on cardiac side-effects, 44% found a greater incidence of QTc prolongation and/or arrhythmias, 44% found no evidence of a significant difference, and 11% mixed results. The strongest available evidence points towards the inefficacy of CQ and HCQ in prophylaxis or in the treatment of hospitalised COVID-19 patients.
【저자키워드】 COVID-19, Efficacy, Chloroquine, Hydroxychloroquine, Safety, 【초록키워드】 Treatment, clinical trial, therapy, COVID-19 pandemic, drugs, clinical trials, systematic review, observational study, Prophylaxis, outcomes, Probability, adverse event, Viral transmission, Efficacy and safety, HCQ, incidence, Arrhythmias, Evidence, QTC prolongation, Side-effects, Endpoint, significant difference, control group, no significant difference, clinician, hospitalised COVID-19 patients, clearance, human clinical trial, greater, identify, diagnosed, required, unique, treated patient, 【제목키워드】 Efficacy and safety,