Introduction The Royal College of Surgeons of England (RCSEng) and the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Glasgow (RCPSG) offer the bi-collegiate Membership in Orthodontics (MOrth) examination, a summative assessment of specialist knowledge, skill and behaviour in orthodontics. The COVID-19 pandemic has had a profound global effect on almost every facet of normal life, including the conduct of face-to-face examinations. We highlight development, implementation and feedback for the bi-collegiate MOrth Part 2 examination delivered remotely to a cohort of candidates in September 2020 by RCSEng/RCPSG. Methods Two anonymised online surveys (Google Forms) were distributed via electronic mail following completion of the examination diet. Forty-two candidates were sent a survey covering four domains and comprising a total of 31 questions. The 20 examiners were sent a survey containing eight questions. In both surveys, free-text responses were also collected. A rating system was used to categorise responses. All survey responses were summarised in an online data collection sheet. Results The response rate was 78.5% (33/42) and 75% (15/20) for candidates and examiners, respectively. Overall, favourable responses in relation to all sections of the assessment were elicited from candidates with the majority (mean 79.8%; 75.8-81.9%) reporting that the online examination format worked well. Equally, favourable responses were reported by examiners. Notably, 80% of examiners felt that the online exam style did not affect the mark a candidate would receive, and 100% were confident that the marks the candidates received were a reflection of their ability and were not affected by the online delivery of the assessment. Conclusions The feedback from both candidates and examiners relating to an online remote assessment of the bi-collegiate MOrth Part 2 was generally positive. Based on the survey responses, this format of a high-stakes examination was acceptable to all stakeholders, and demonstrated a high level of perceived validity and reliability in terms of content. Key points Highlights development, implementation and feedback for a remote bi-collegiate specialty examination in orthodontics. Candidates responded favourably in relation to all sections of the assessment, with the majority reporting that the online examination format worked well. Examiners were confident that the marks candidates received reflected their ability and were not affected by online delivery of the assessment. Remote delivery of a high-stakes specialty examination is a valid and reliable method of assessment, facilitating trainee progression in an environment of social distancing.
【초록키워드】 reliability, social distancing, knowledge, COVID-19 pandemic, progression, Orthodontics, Cohort, response, implementation, remote, Validity, England, Google, online delivery, domain, candidate, physician, college, positive, examiner, offer, responses, highlight, Result, was used, collected, reported, eight, reflected, majority, demonstrated, not affect, not affected, elicited, receive, categorise, Part, 【제목키워드】 COVID-19 pandemic, implementation, development,