The SARS-CoV-2 virus is a public health emergency. Social distancing is a key approach to slowing disease transmission. However, more evidence is needed on its efficacy, and little is known on the types of areas where it is more or less effective. We obtained county-level data on COVID-19 incidence and mortality during the first wave, smartphone-based average social distancing (0–5, where higher numbers indicate more social distancing), and census data on demographics and socioeconomic status. Using generalized linear mixed models with a Poisson distribution, we modeled associations between social distancing and COVID-19 incidence and mortality, and multiplicative interaction terms to assess effect modification. In multivariable models, each unit increase in social distancing was associated with a 26% decrease ( p < 0.0001) in COVID-19 incidence and a 31% decrease ( p < 0.0001) in COVID-19 mortality. Percent crowding, minority population, and median household income were all statistically significant effect modifiers. County-level increases in social distancing led to reductions in COVID-19 incidence and mortality but were most effective in counties with lower percentages of black residents, higher median household incomes, and with lower levels of household crowding.
【저자키워드】 COVID-19, social distancing, socioeconomic status, Household crowding, ecologic study, 【초록키워드】 Efficacy, Mortality, SARS-CoV-2 virus, public health emergency, First wave, association, disease transmission, Evidence, Poisson distribution, COVID-19 mortality, demographics, COVID-19 incidence, average, Multivariable models, Modification, linear mixed model, approach, effective, decrease, median, less, increase in, reductions in, statistically significant, increases in, multiplicative interaction term, percentage, 【제목키워드】 crowding, status, with COVID-19,