Social distancing policies have been regarded as effective in containing the rapid spread of COVID-19. However, there is a limited understanding of policy effectiveness from a spatiotemporal perspective. This study integrates geographical, demographical, and other key factors into a regression-based event study framework, to assess the effectiveness of seven major policies on human mobility and COVID-19 case growth rates, with a spatiotemporal emphasis. Our results demonstrate that stay-at-home orders, workplace closures, and public information campaigns were effective in decreasing the confirmed case growth rate. For stay-at-home orders and workplace closures, these changes were associated with significant decreases ( p < 0.05) in mobility. Public information campaigns did not see these same mobility trends, but the growth rate still decreased significantly in all analysis periods ( p < 0.01). Stay-at-home orders and international/national travel controls had limited mitigation effects on the death case growth rate ( p < 0.1). The relationships between policies, mobility, and epidemiological metrics allowed us to evaluate the effectiveness of each policy and gave us insight into the spatiotemporal patterns and mechanisms by which these measures work. Our analysis will provide policymakers with better knowledge regarding the effectiveness of measures in space–time disaggregation.
【저자키워드】 COVID-19, Mortality, heterogeneity, Mobility, Panel data, social distancing measures, policy analysis, event study, spatiotemporal, 【초록키워드】 knowledge, Travel, Effectiveness, Control, epidemiological, information, change, mechanism, Analysis, growth rates, death case, Metrics, growth, COVID-19 case, Perspective, measure, significant decrease, key factor, Effect, Public, effective, spread of COVID-19, Seven, evaluate, significantly, 【제목키워드】 Human, Policy, Impact, measure,