COVID-19 was initially reported in China at the end of 2019 and soon thereafter, in March 2020, the WHO declared it a pandemic. Until October 2021, over 240 million COVID-19 cases were recorded, with 4.9 mln deaths. In order to stop the spread of this disease, it is crucial to monitor and detect any infected person. The etiologic agent of COVID-19 is a novel coronavirus called SARS-CoV-2. The gold standard for the detection of the virus is the RT-qPCR method. This study evaluated two RNA extraction methods and four commercial RT-qPCR assays routinely used in diagnostic laboratories for detecting SARS-CoV-2 in human specimens from the upper respiratory tract. We analyzed a panel of 70 clinical samples with varying RNA loads. Our study demonstrated the significant impact of the diagnostic methods selected by the laboratory on the SARS-CoV-2 detection in clinical specimens with low viral loads.
【저자키워드】 COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, diagnostic, RT-qPCR assay, RNA extraction method, 【초록키워드】 pandemic, virus, Novel coronavirus, Laboratory, Spread, China, RNA extraction, RT-qPCR, disease, upper respiratory tract, Diagnostic method, deaths, COVID-19 case, gold standard, viral loads, specimen, MONITOR, RNA loads, clinical sample, selected, analyzed, detect, reported, evaluated, demonstrated, the WHO, were recorded, the SARS-CoV-2, 【제목키워드】 detection, RT-qPCR, Impact, extraction, acid, Sample,