Abstract Wild aquatic birds are natural reservoirs of low‐pathogenicity avian influenza viruses (LPAIVs). Laughing gulls inoculated with four gull‐origin LPAIVs (H7N3, H6N4, H3N8, and H2N3) had a predominate respiratory infection. By contrast, mallards inoculated with two mallard‐origin LPAIVs (H5N6 and H4N8) became infected and had similar virus titers in oropharyngeal (OP) and cloacal (CL) swabs. The trend toward predominate OP shedding in gulls suggest a greater role of direct bird transmission in maintenance, whereas mallards shedding suggests importance of fecal‐oral transmission through water contamination. Additional infectivity and pathogenesis studies are needed to confirm this replication difference for LPAI viruses in gulls.
【저자키워드】 Pathogenesis, pathogenicity, Avian Influenza, wild birds, Mallard, laughing gulls, low‐pathogenicity avian influenza,