Comparative performance of SARS-CoV-2 lateral flow antigen tests and association with detection of infectious virus in clinical specimens: a single-centre laboratory evaluation study
SARS-CoV-2 측방유동항원 검사의 비교 성능 및 임상 검체에서 감염성 바이러스 검출과의 연관성: 단일 센터 실험실 평가 연구
Articles
[키워드] alternative technology
Analysis
Antigen
association
B.1.1.7
B.1.1.7 variant
be positive
cassette
clinical sample
clinical samples
collected
Community
Comparative
comparison
Comprehensive
copy number
cornerstone
correlation
COVID-19
Ct value
Ct values
Culture
Department
Device
diagnostic
diagnostic test
disease severities
dominant
ENCODE
evaluated
except for
family
finding
FIVE
Fluorescence
foundation
funding
Genotype
greater
group
head
Head-to-head comparison
health-care
help
highest
household contacts
identify
implementation
infected individual
infected individuals
infectious sample
Infectious virus
Inpatient
Inpatients
King
Laboratory
Lateral
lateral flow
LFD
limit of detection
limitation
London
Longitudinal studies
longitudinal study
Medical Research Council
naso-oropharyngeal swab
not affected
Outpatient
outpatients
PCR
PCR cycle
PCR testing
PFUs
plaque-forming unit
positive
Quantitative
quantitative culture
question
raised
ranged
Rapid
Rapid test
real-time RT-PCR
reduced
RNA
RT-rtPCR
SARS-CoV-2
SARS-CoV-2 N gene
SARS-CoV-2 testing
selected
sensitivities
sensitivity
Specificities
specificity
spring
St Thomas' Hospital
Support
Surescreen
Swab
swabs
Test
test result
tested
Thoma
threshold
UK variant B.1.1.7
understanding
Vero E6
VERO E6 cells
Viral
viral culture
viral growth
Viral RNA
virus
virus culture
virus infectivity
Wellcome Trust
were assessed
were used
whole-genome sequencing
[DOI] 10.1016/S2666-5247(21)00143-9 PMC 바로가기 [Article Type] Articles
[DOI] 10.1016/S2666-5247(21)00143-9 PMC 바로가기 [Article Type] Articles